Even a layman going through these details of the FIR would easily find it to be a well planned conspiracy to enmesh Asharam Bapu and His son Narayan Sai. Then there are more such aspects to this case. It is actually an attack on the Indian culture itself that has taken shape in entangling one saint after another like Kripaluji Maharaj, Swami Keshwanandaji, Swami Nityanandaji etc. and presently Bapuji and Narayan Sai through false allegations. It is also a matter of great concern that the channels made it public with great fanfare when the above mentioned saints were entangled under false allegations; but why didn’t they find it necessary to show it to the public when those saints were released with full honours? It has been the very same even upon exposure of all the conspiracies so far hatched against Asharam Bapu.
Postmortem of Surat Case FIR on Asaram Bapu and His Son Narayan Sai
Two real sisters dictates the sexual-abuse allegations on Asharam Bapu and his son Narayan Sai !!!
Why charge so disgusting on a famous saint? While millions of followers, millions of Hindu support him. To find truth, We met with followers and non-followers , It is very strange FIR based on 11 year old incident. So there is no evidence to prove this case , Except FIR exploration. While We read FIR then it clearly show , It’s a false propaganda.
Let’s explore Surat case FIR ,
Both these sisters are married. The elder of them (33 years) has accused Asaram Bapu, while the younger one’s (30 years) allegation is against Narayan Sai. However, their FIRs themselves expose the well planned conspiracy of the perpetrators.
The elder sister says that the so called event took place with her in the year 2001. Whereas it was in the year 2002 that her younger sister came to stay in the ashram. Just imagine, can a woman, who has been raped somewhere ever like her own sister to stay there? No way! Here the simple question arises as to why she didn’t forbid her younger sister from coming to the ashram? If she was afraid of telling the truth at that time, she must have stopped her sister using some excuse. But this did not happen. Why?
Any lady of noble descent would hate the man who has raped her, and tries her best to keep away from him, whether or not she has launched a complaint against the same with the police. But here the woman (the elder sister) in question always had a very good behaviour record with Asaram Bapu. Had the filthy matter she has written in the FIR been true, it was imperative on her part to leave the ashram immediately. But the lady went on to become a speaker of the ashram. She gave discourses from the stage and sang hymns in praise of Asaram Bapu in front of thousands of devotees. This amply proves that the allegation, which she has brought against Asaram Bapu is completely fake, nothing such ever took place.
The elder sister says, “I was very much frightened after that event of rape in 2001 and sought to flee away from the ashram, but couldn’t find an opportunity for that.”
Whereas, she has herself stated in the FIR that she continued to visit other cities during this period. The fact is that she repeatedly moved to various small towns and cities such as Baroda, Anand, Nadiad, Bharuch, Mehsana, Ludhiana, Rajpura, Amravati, Ahmadnagar, etc. in the course of giving discourses. And she visited even Surat, her home city (where her father’s home is), time and again. She had once again visited her homeland while suffering from T.B. So, couldn’t she find a single good chance of fleeing away in all these 6 long years? Couldn’t she have got enough opportunity to inform the police or her family people? Why did she need to plan her escape? The elder sister has stated in the FIR that after the so called rape she was taken on a vehicle to the Shaligram Apartments and dropped there, from where she came to the Mahila ashram on foot. The distance between the Shaligram Apartments and the Mahila Ashram is about half a kilometer. Had there been any trace of truth in the story of the woman, then why didn’t she make use of the great opportunity to escape from there only? There are so many households and shops near Shaligram, and a good number of people throng that area too. Under these circumstances she could easily have gone to her own house, asked someone for help or even approached the police as well. Why didn’t she go for any of them?
The younger sister has accused Narayan Sai of having raped her in Asaram Bapu’s hut; where after she went home. And on the very next day, she went to Saiji’s Himmatnagar Mahila Ashram; for which she explains that Sai had himself telephoned her to do so.
First of all Saiji never stays in Bapuji’s hut.
Secondly, it is beyond sane comprehension as to why a woman who is raped one day and the next day she leaves for her home and again decides to leave the most secured place in the world – her home – to go and stay at the ashram instructed by the same Saiji; and there too she stayed for two long years serving the ashram with full dedication as a director? This itself is a proof enough that nothing untoward happened with that woman ever in the ashram, and that it is due to sheer avarice that she has taken this well planned step to malign the immaculate character of Saiji.
The younger sister explains that when she went to the ashram for the second time, no incidence of molestation or anything of the sort took place; and hence she regained her faith in the ashram. Then again she claims that while she stayed there in the ashram for 2 years as the director Saiji continued to harass her whenever he came to the ashram. All these statements are self-defeating and simply ridiculous that as she found no one molesting or disturbing her otherwise for the first few days, she got her faith reinforced and that she continued to stay in Saiji’s ashram tolerating all sexual harassments meted out to her during those two years! Whereas it is difficult to digest as to how she didn’t get a chance to flee away from the ashram which is so openly situated in the Gambhoi village of Himmatnagar (Guj.)? That is not all, that lady was well acquainted with the local people, and she used to go to the market and the city regularly.
According to the younger sister she left ashram in 2004 and she got married in 2010. Even then she said absolutely nothing about all this to her parents; and it was only on 1st October 2013 that she revealed all this to her husband and lodged an FIR on 6th October 2013 for the first time. How is it possible for a victim of sexual harassment to say nothing about her suffering and pain to any of her relatives for 11 long years? A medical test after years of the event is not going to reveal any reality. Whereas, the medical report has an important role to play in a rape case.
The younger sister says that after that harassment she handled the post of a director in an ashram of Saiji. After serving the ashram for two years she left the ashram and went back home. Being the chief director of the ashram she had the responsibility to complete the formalities regarding the accounts of the ashram, so Saiji called her through a phone call. So she left for the ashram. Enroute to the ashram she stayed with an acquaintance for a night. She was to leave for the ashram from there, and she had informed Narayan Sai about the same over the phone as well. Further on this lady has got it noted down that some 6-7 ladies sent by the ashram pelted stones at the residence of her acquaintance, frightened by which she went back home. How bogus are all these statements! Had the event of pelting stones been true the master of the house or the neighbours would have registered a complaint against it with the police? There is simply no proof of the stone pelting event whatsoever. If Narayan Sai wanted to call her to the ashram, and when she herself was ready to go there; then why should he arrange for stone pelting at all? Even a layman does have this much of common sense.
The younger sister left ashram in 2005 for home, and yet the elder sister didn’t ask her the reason for her leaving the ashram; and even the younger sister didn’t find it necessary to give any reason for the same. Is it possible between two close sisters? The younger sister puts it like this, “I was so frightened that I fled from the ashram showing a lame excuse. After 8 days, upon getting informed by a lady, I telephoned to Narayan Sai.” But when she had left the ashram for good, why should she telephone back to Narayan Sai just because some lady has informed her about it? This again proves that nothing of the kind took place at all.
Both the sisters have got it noted down in the FIR, “We could say nothing to anybody owing to their great leadership and influence, and have told nobody about this till date.” In the year 2008 the state government had got it published in the local newspapers of Gujarat that anyone who wants to complain against the ashram, the police would go to the residence of such a person and get the case registered there itself; and that the names of such people too will be kept secret. Despite this ease given by the government why didn’t these two sisters come out with their complaints at that time? And what is more astonishing is that even after 6-8 years of leaving the ashram they were never even contacted to by the ashram, let alone giving any kind of threat or harming them in any way despite the so called leadership and influence of Bapuji. Whereas a rapist, who has millions of followers both in the nation and abroad, would always be in the fear that such a lady would reveal the facts after leaving the ashram. Contrary to this, neither Bapuji nor Narayan Sai had any such fear ever in their minds.
On enquiring the villagers it was revealed that the two sisters continued to go to the satsang programmes even after leaving the ashram. Moreover, the younger sister had come to have darshan of Saiji at Bardoli (Guj.) even in the current year 2013 itself, the photographs and video clippings have been presented before the honourable court; wherein both husband and wife are seen having darshan of Saiji with great faith and devotion. So, notable point here is -whether anybody who has been sexually harassed for years together can ever have so much devotion for her oppressor?
Such a big number of falsehoods are simply enough in themselves for any intelligent man to comprehend the truth of the matter. For one, used to speaking and writing the truth always, would never commit such mistakes ever. However, when false and imaginary stories are created, people often commit such mistakes as – who was present there and who was not, what actually happened, etc. Therefore I appeal to all my fellow countrymen that they should see things using their own conscience and not through the spectacles of the media.